Contributed by
Enterprise deals are rarely lost in the boardroom. They are lost in procurement queues, legal redlines and the quiet competitor nobody tracked. The champion agrees, the business head signs off, and the contract then sits for six weeks, picks up a security questionnaire and lands in the next financial year, just as a rival lowers its bid.
MEDDIC (https://interloop.in/blogs/meddic-sales-framework) names the people and the decision. MEDDPICC adds the two things that most often derail large deals after the decision is made: the paperwork and the competition. If your deals involve formal procurement, MEDDIC alone is not enough.
Key insights
- Bigger deals bring bigger buying groups. Clari data reported by Demand Gen Report shows small deals involve about seven people on the buying side, medium deals about 10 and large deals around 19.
- Competition dilutes your time with the buyer. Gartner found buyers spend 17% of their journey with potential suppliers; with three suppliers in contention, Gartner's Brent Adamson estimates each gets 'maybe 5 or 6 percent'.
- Independent research shapes the shortlist. The same Gartner research shows buyers spend 45% of their time researching on their own, online and offline, often before a seller is involved.
- Two letters, one lesson. MEDDPICC adds Paper process and Competition to MEDDIC, giving eight elements in all.
The two extra letters
P for Paper process. This is everything that happens between 'yes' and a signed contract. Who reviews the agreement? Does procurement run a formal tender? Is there a vendor registration step, a security or compliance review, a board approval above a certain value? How long does each step usually take?
The paper process is not the same as the decision process. The decision process is how the customer decides to buy. The paper process is how they actually make the purchase official. Teams that confuse the two forecast deals to close in the month the decision is made, and then watch them slip by a quarter.
C for Competition. Who else is the customer talking to, and what does each option offer? Competition includes rival vendors, but it also includes building the solution in-house, using a tool the customer already owns, and the most common competitor of all: doing nothing.
Knowing the competition changes how a team sells. It shapes which decision criteria to reinforce, which proof points to lead with and where the champion will need extra support.
Why the extra letters matter more as deals grow
On a mid-sized deal, a missing paper process might cost a few weeks. On a large one, it can cost the deal. More people on the buying side means more approvals, more departments with a say and more opportunities for a competitor to find a sympathetic ear.
That is why MEDDPICC tends to be used by teams selling into large organisations, government bodies and regulated industries, where formal procurement is normal and contracts run to dozens of pages.
Questions worth asking early
For the paper process: 'Once you decide, what happens next?' 'Who has to sign, and in what order?' 'Have you bought something similar recently, and how long did the contract take?'
For competition: 'Who else are you looking at?' 'What would you do if you didn't go ahead with anyone?' 'What did you like about the other options?'
These questions feel awkward at first. Asked early and naturally, they save months.
Building it into the deal record
Like MEDDIC, MEDDPICC works best when it lives in the CRM rather than in a rep's notebook. The paper process can be captured as a simple checklist on the deal, with expected dates for each step, so the forecast close date reflects reality. Competitors can be tracked as a picklist on the deal, which over time shows who you meet most often and how often you win against each.
In Zoho CRM, for example, this usually means a few custom fields and a related list for competitors on the Deals module, with Blueprint stages that require the paper process to be mapped before a deal moves to 'negotiation'. It's a modest change to customise Zoho CRM, but it gives managers a much clearer view of where large deals really stand.
For a wider comparison of qualification approaches, see our guide to B2B sales frameworks (https://interloop.in/blogs/b2b-sales-frameworks).
Our view
The paper process is the most under-managed stage in enterprise B2B selling. Teams forecast on the decision date and treat contracting as admin. It is not admin. It is a stage with its own owner, its own timeline and its own risks.
People. Make one person accountable for the paper process on every large deal, and bring your own legal and finance teams in before the customer's do.
Process. Set the forecast close date from the paper process, never from the decision date.
Intelligence. Track competitors on every deal. Within a year you will know where you win, where you lose and why, which most teams only guess at.
The misreading we see most is treating competition as rival vendors only. On large deals, the strongest competitor is usually the customer's own status quo, and it deserves the same analysis as any named rival.
Signs it's working
Close dates on large deals stop moving so often. Fewer deals are lost 'late', after the team thought they had won. Win and loss reports start to show which competitors you beat and why. And procurement becomes a planned stage rather than a surprise.
In enterprise sales, winning the decision is half the job. Getting it signed before anything changes is the other half.
